Skip to main content

CloudFormation provides a native way for AWS users to define infrastructure as code. Being tightly integrated with AWS services, it offers simple and quick configuration of purely AWS-based infrastructures. The tradeoff is limited portability beyond AWS.

On the other hand, Terraform takes an infrastructure-agnostic approach using declarative configuration files known as Terraform Configuration Language (HCL). With plugins for all major cloud platforms, it provides cross-cloud infrastructure automation and management. This allows consistent definition of environments spanning AWS, Azure, Google Cloud and others.

Introduction to AWS CloudFormation and Terraform as Popular IaC Tools

With exponential growth in the digital market, companies depend on cloud infrastructure to power their applications and services. But, managing such dynamic environments is, inarguably, a complex challenge. Traditionally, system administrators would manually configure each server or database as needs arose. However, this process lacked consistency and traceability.

Since it needs prompt inventions, “Infrastructure as Code” has emerged to address these issues. This practice applies the principles and processes of software development to infrastructure management. Rather than directly manipulating cloud assets like virtual machines, developers define those components as code – using templates, configuration files, or other machine-readable formats.

It allows infrastructure changes to be proposed, reviewed, tested, and implemented just like application features. Complete environments can be consistently replicated from a single source of truth.

Problems become visible at the code level rather than buried in disparate configuration files. Teams are freed from the ticket-based model of manually building servers and can collaborate seamlessly on infrastructure development as part of their regular workflow.

Leading products in this space include AWS CloudFormation and HashiCorp Terraform. CloudFormation provides templates to model AWS resources natively, while Terraform takes a multi-cloud approach with declarative configuration files. Both tools cater to the critical need for infrastructure automation and standardization across teams.

By treating infrastructure as just another form of code, IT organizations gain visibility, control, and agility in managing even the largest cloud deployments. Infrastructure as Code has thus become a foundational best practice for optimizing operations in today’s distributed computing environments.

What is AWS CloudFormation

AWS CloudFormation allows users to define cloud infrastructure using templates. They can provision and manage AWS resources in a predictable, repeatable, and incremental manner.

Primary Functions

  1. Define and provision AWS resources like EC2 instances, databases, etc, using templates
  2. Detect drift from template and management of resource lifecycle
  3. Rollout changes in a safe, incremental manner via change sets

Key Features

  • Template-based – Uses JSON/YAML templates to describe resources and configurations
  • Integrated with AWS services – Tight API integration for deployment and management
  • Version control – Templates stored in S3 for versioning changes over time
  • Resource management – Create, update, delete resources according to templates

Common Use Cases

AWS CloudFormation is very useful for deploying applications that have different tiers or components that work together. It helps make sure the database, application servers, load balancers, and all other related pieces are set up correctly no matter where you deploy it – like moving from testing to production.

It’s also great for setting up important systems reliably over and over. Instead of manually building out the servers and security every time you need a new production environment, CloudFormation lets you define it once as a code that is easy to reproduce correctly.

For really big and intricate AWS environments with many interconnected services, CloudFormation is very helpful. It verifies that all the complex dependencies are modeled right.

Security and compliance teams like it because they can specify approved configuration templates. And CloudFormation will verify that environments match them.

It also helps with disaster recovery. If a production system ever fails, CloudFormation makes it simple to rebuild it from the original template so your application can be backed up quickly. Overall, it saves a lot of time and reduces risks.

CloudFormation works best for large AWS deployments involving dozens of interdependent resources. The integrated workflow simplifies scenarios like continuous delivery pipelines, load testing infrastructures, and such for cloud-native applications.

What is a Terraform

Terraform is an open source tool that lets you define and manage cloud infrastructure resources, like virtual servers and databases, using simple configuration files. It can automatically create, update, and maintain those resources across multiple cloud providers like AWS, Azure, and GCP.

Primary Functions:

  • Define resources using .tf files in a declarative configuration language.
  • Provision, update, and manage resources across multiple cloud platforms.
  • Visualize dependency graph and compose changes incrementally.

Key Features

  • Open source – Free to use and extensively customizable
  • Provider agnostic – Integrates with any infrastructure via provider plugins
  • Configuration language (HCL) – Declarative syntax for readable files
  • State management – Tracks resources in state file for reproducibility

Common Use Cases

Terraform is very useful if your infrastructure uses multiple cloud platforms like AWS and Azure. It lets you define everything consistently using the same files no matter where it’s deployed.

A lot of teams also find it handy for automating their infra during the coding and testing process. Terraform can be run as part of the automated build and release pipelines to quickly set up what developers need.

Developers like how it gives them control and flexibility to set up their own environments on demand. They don’t have to wait for other teams to do it.

It’s a relief when moving existing servers and networks to the cloud too. Terraform can gradually shift everything over in a safe and organized way.

Many companies create a single place for all the templates so everyone uses the same ones. That way, things are standardized, and people can easily find what they need. It makes working together a lot smoother.

Therefore, Terraform excels at managing complex, hybrid environments that require multiple infrastructure providers.

Comparison of AWS CloudFormation and Terraform

Ease of Use

CloudFormation has a simpler learning curve due to its tight AWS integration. Terraform requires installing plugins for each cloud provider, increasing complexity. However, Terraform’s declarative code format is easier to read than CloudFormation templates.

Flexibility and Extensibility

CloudFormation is limited to AWS resources only. Terraform strongly supports third party tools and multi-cloud/hybrid architectures using plugins. It offers more adaptability for complex infrastructures.

Community and Support

AWS provides support for CloudFormation. Terraform benefits from large, open source community contributing modules. Documentation quality is high for both.

Cost Implications

CloudFormation does not incur any license fees. Terraform is open source but commercial support costs apply. Using Terraform across multiple clouds could incur provider usage costs while CloudFormation reduces vendor lock-in within AWS-only environments.

In summary, CloudFormation is easiest for simpler, AWS-centric use cases with native integration. Terraform powers more sophisticated, multi-platform infrastructures with richer flexibility but a steeper learning curve. Both enable valuable infrastructure as Code practices. Choice depends on cloud strategy, skills, and specific use cases.

Factors to Consider for Making a Choice

Here are some key factors to consider when choosing between CloudFormation and Terraform:

Assessing Organizational Needs

Ask yourself these questions:

  1. Currently, is your environment solely based in AWS, or do you already utilize multiple cloud platforms?

This will determine if you need a solution tailored for AWS or one that can include different providers.

  1. As your business and technology footprint expands, will you primarily look to add more services within AWS, or do workload demands indicate a need to leverage other clouds as well?

Projecting growth trends helps with this decision.

  1. Do factors like application portability, disaster recovery locations, partnerships with other cloud vendors, etc., point towards deeper integration of multiple platforms?

Or do priorities lie predominantly with AWS’s wide service range?

  1. Considering both current and expected operational complexities, do workload management and costs justify a single-vendor solution? Or would a hybrid approach spread across various clouds be more suitable?

It will help you be clear on whether your needs are best met long-term with a AWS-centric or multi-cloud oriented configuration tool.

Questioning Skill Set Availability

  • Do team members already have experience with CloudFormation or Terraform?
  • What level of training would either tool require?
  • Are engineers already well-versed in AWS services/APIs or multi-cloud management?

Long-Term Strategy

The organization’s long-term cloud strategy is also important to consider. Suppose the company has already built up significant resources within AWS and expects to remain reliant on them. In that case, CloudFormation may be the best fit as it is designed specifically for AWS. However, if you have diversifying providers or your infrastructure needs are likely to change over time in terms of services used, Terraform would allow for easier adjustments later.

Additionally, looking at the scalability of each tool is important – will one handle future growth better than the other as infrastructure expands? Periodically, re-evaluating how well the chosen IaC solution aligns with the organization’s evolving technical direction helps ensure long-term success.

Careful evaluation of these factors helps determine if CloudFormation suffices given current AWS dependence or if Terraform opens up more options due to its multi-platform coverage. Revisiting this also ensures that the chosen IaC tool still aligns with shifting technical and business priorities.

Conclusion

While both AWS CloudFormation and HashiCorp Terraform are valuable tools for implementing Infrastructure as Code practices, the optimal choice between them depends on balancing various organizational factors.

Carefully consider an organization’s current technical needs, strategy, skills, growth projections, and integration priorities. It will help you determine whether a CloudFormation or Terraform primary strategy will best enable the reproducible infrastructure that underpins cloud-based operations today and into the future.

Leave a Reply